Problem with newdimen and widthof












3














I have a problem with the following code under TexLive 2018:



documentclass{report}

usepackage{calc}
usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
usepackage{parskip}

newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8.88. }

newlength{testb}
setlength{testb}{widthof{8.88. }}


begin{document}

chapter{Exercises}

begin{enumerate}[labelindent=0pt,labelwidth=widthof{8.88. },label=textbf{thechapter.arabic*.},leftmargin=!,ref=thechapter.arabic*]
item Hallo
end{enumerate}

end{document}


The newdimen produces an error on my system while the setlength doesn't:



Part of logfile:



lblwidth=dimen106

! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
widthof
l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
{8.88. }
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)

! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
<to be read again>
widthof
l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
{8.88. }
Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
cm, mm, dd, cc, nd, nc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
To recover gracefully from this error, it's best to
delete the erroneous units; e.g., type `2' to delete
two letters. (See Chapter 27 of The TeXbook.)


! LaTeX Error: Missing begin{document}.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8
.88. }
You're in trouble here. Try typing <return> to proceed.
If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.

testb=skip47
(./widthof.aux)


Changing newdimen to newskip doesn't solve the problem.










share|improve this question



























    3














    I have a problem with the following code under TexLive 2018:



    documentclass{report}

    usepackage{calc}
    usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
    usepackage{parskip}

    newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8.88. }

    newlength{testb}
    setlength{testb}{widthof{8.88. }}


    begin{document}

    chapter{Exercises}

    begin{enumerate}[labelindent=0pt,labelwidth=widthof{8.88. },label=textbf{thechapter.arabic*.},leftmargin=!,ref=thechapter.arabic*]
    item Hallo
    end{enumerate}

    end{document}


    The newdimen produces an error on my system while the setlength doesn't:



    Part of logfile:



    lblwidth=dimen106

    ! Missing number, treated as zero.
    <to be read again>
    widthof
    l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
    {8.88. }
    A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
    (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
    look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)

    ! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
    <to be read again>
    widthof
    l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
    {8.88. }
    Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
    cm, mm, dd, cc, nd, nc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
    I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
    To recover gracefully from this error, it's best to
    delete the erroneous units; e.g., type `2' to delete
    two letters. (See Chapter 27 of The TeXbook.)


    ! LaTeX Error: Missing begin{document}.

    See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
    Type H <return> for immediate help.
    ...

    l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8
    .88. }
    You're in trouble here. Try typing <return> to proceed.
    If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.

    testb=skip47
    (./widthof.aux)


    Changing newdimen to newskip doesn't solve the problem.










    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3







      I have a problem with the following code under TexLive 2018:



      documentclass{report}

      usepackage{calc}
      usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
      usepackage{parskip}

      newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8.88. }

      newlength{testb}
      setlength{testb}{widthof{8.88. }}


      begin{document}

      chapter{Exercises}

      begin{enumerate}[labelindent=0pt,labelwidth=widthof{8.88. },label=textbf{thechapter.arabic*.},leftmargin=!,ref=thechapter.arabic*]
      item Hallo
      end{enumerate}

      end{document}


      The newdimen produces an error on my system while the setlength doesn't:



      Part of logfile:



      lblwidth=dimen106

      ! Missing number, treated as zero.
      <to be read again>
      widthof
      l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
      {8.88. }
      A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
      (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
      look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)

      ! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
      <to be read again>
      widthof
      l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
      {8.88. }
      Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
      cm, mm, dd, cc, nd, nc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
      I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
      To recover gracefully from this error, it's best to
      delete the erroneous units; e.g., type `2' to delete
      two letters. (See Chapter 27 of The TeXbook.)


      ! LaTeX Error: Missing begin{document}.

      See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
      Type H <return> for immediate help.
      ...

      l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8
      .88. }
      You're in trouble here. Try typing <return> to proceed.
      If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.

      testb=skip47
      (./widthof.aux)


      Changing newdimen to newskip doesn't solve the problem.










      share|improve this question













      I have a problem with the following code under TexLive 2018:



      documentclass{report}

      usepackage{calc}
      usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
      usepackage{parskip}

      newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8.88. }

      newlength{testb}
      setlength{testb}{widthof{8.88. }}


      begin{document}

      chapter{Exercises}

      begin{enumerate}[labelindent=0pt,labelwidth=widthof{8.88. },label=textbf{thechapter.arabic*.},leftmargin=!,ref=thechapter.arabic*]
      item Hallo
      end{enumerate}

      end{document}


      The newdimen produces an error on my system while the setlength doesn't:



      Part of logfile:



      lblwidth=dimen106

      ! Missing number, treated as zero.
      <to be read again>
      widthof
      l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
      {8.88. }
      A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
      (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
      look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)

      ! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
      <to be read again>
      widthof
      l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof
      {8.88. }
      Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
      cm, mm, dd, cc, nd, nc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
      I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
      To recover gracefully from this error, it's best to
      delete the erroneous units; e.g., type `2' to delete
      two letters. (See Chapter 27 of The TeXbook.)


      ! LaTeX Error: Missing begin{document}.

      See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
      Type H <return> for immediate help.
      ...

      l.7 newdimenlblwidthlblwidth=widthof{8
      .88. }
      You're in trouble here. Try typing <return> to proceed.
      If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.

      testb=skip47
      (./widthof.aux)


      Changing newdimen to newskip doesn't solve the problem.







      enumitem calc






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      Jesse op den Brouw

      453119




      453119






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          settowidth{lblwidth}{8.88. } has the correct LaTeX syntax and doesn't even require calc.



          If you insist in using calc, you must use setlength:



          setlength{lblwidth}{widthof{8.88. }}


          Why is this? The primitive assignment lblwidth= requires a legal dimension after the =, which widthof isn't.



          By the way, the meaning of widthof is ignorespaces and only in legal calc expressions it becomes really useful. The calc package modifies setlength so that it can understand calc expressions. The primitive assignment cannot be handled this way.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
            – Jesse op den Brouw
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467736%2fproblem-with-newdimen-and-widthof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          settowidth{lblwidth}{8.88. } has the correct LaTeX syntax and doesn't even require calc.



          If you insist in using calc, you must use setlength:



          setlength{lblwidth}{widthof{8.88. }}


          Why is this? The primitive assignment lblwidth= requires a legal dimension after the =, which widthof isn't.



          By the way, the meaning of widthof is ignorespaces and only in legal calc expressions it becomes really useful. The calc package modifies setlength so that it can understand calc expressions. The primitive assignment cannot be handled this way.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
            – Jesse op den Brouw
            1 hour ago
















          3














          settowidth{lblwidth}{8.88. } has the correct LaTeX syntax and doesn't even require calc.



          If you insist in using calc, you must use setlength:



          setlength{lblwidth}{widthof{8.88. }}


          Why is this? The primitive assignment lblwidth= requires a legal dimension after the =, which widthof isn't.



          By the way, the meaning of widthof is ignorespaces and only in legal calc expressions it becomes really useful. The calc package modifies setlength so that it can understand calc expressions. The primitive assignment cannot be handled this way.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
            – Jesse op den Brouw
            1 hour ago














          3












          3








          3






          settowidth{lblwidth}{8.88. } has the correct LaTeX syntax and doesn't even require calc.



          If you insist in using calc, you must use setlength:



          setlength{lblwidth}{widthof{8.88. }}


          Why is this? The primitive assignment lblwidth= requires a legal dimension after the =, which widthof isn't.



          By the way, the meaning of widthof is ignorespaces and only in legal calc expressions it becomes really useful. The calc package modifies setlength so that it can understand calc expressions. The primitive assignment cannot be handled this way.






          share|improve this answer












          settowidth{lblwidth}{8.88. } has the correct LaTeX syntax and doesn't even require calc.



          If you insist in using calc, you must use setlength:



          setlength{lblwidth}{widthof{8.88. }}


          Why is this? The primitive assignment lblwidth= requires a legal dimension after the =, which widthof isn't.



          By the way, the meaning of widthof is ignorespaces and only in legal calc expressions it becomes really useful. The calc package modifies setlength so that it can understand calc expressions. The primitive assignment cannot be handled this way.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          egreg

          708k8618813163




          708k8618813163












          • I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
            – Jesse op den Brouw
            1 hour ago


















          • I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
            – Jesse op den Brouw
            1 hour ago
















          I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
          – Jesse op den Brouw
          1 hour ago




          I never thought of that. BTW, I'm reading your Italian book with the aid of our Italian housemaid
          – Jesse op den Brouw
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467736%2fproblem-with-newdimen-and-widthof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

          How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

          TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'