Are fly wheels a valid means of energy storage for powering a large space station?












2














This is something that was just offhandedly mentioned in a Sci-Fi book I read once and as I am now writing one myself I thought I might use it.



The scenario is that I have a ship approaching a warp gate and am describing the appearance and mechanics of the gate. The idea is that warp drive research on Earth ended in a dead end because we were never able to effectively produce enough energy to power a warp field larger than the ship and generator itself.



Jump to 400 hundred years in the future and humanity has colonized a few other star systems by means of sub-light, generation ships. They then develop a functioning warp bridge, rather than a ship drive, by building massive warp field generators on each end.



The generator stations, basically warp gates for simplicity, generate the necessary energy over several days, and then expend it all in a single day or a few hours (undecided) to power the warp field.



Would massive flywheels be a valid form of energy storage? If not, what other ideas of energy storage might be more reasonable?



I would like to clarify that this is the heaviest handwavium in my entire story. Besides the completion of warp theory, functioning cryogenics, fusion drive technology, and some advances in material science, the story is supposed to be as reasonably realistic as I can get. Real physics. No artificial gravity. Space travel takes days and weeks between planets in-system. The warp gates are posted at the far edge of a solar system, allowing instantaneous travel between systems, but once exiting the gate traveling in-system is much slower again.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Flywheels are in fact used for various applications that need high, short-duration current without affecting the local grid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Test_laboratories So having a large one in your warp station is simple extrapolation.
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago










  • Here's another article detailing the use of Flywheels and Batteries for high impact energy usage. ktoo.org/2017/09/15/… I'm not smart enough to answer whether or not that can be extrapolated.
    – GuidingOlive
    50 mins ago
















2














This is something that was just offhandedly mentioned in a Sci-Fi book I read once and as I am now writing one myself I thought I might use it.



The scenario is that I have a ship approaching a warp gate and am describing the appearance and mechanics of the gate. The idea is that warp drive research on Earth ended in a dead end because we were never able to effectively produce enough energy to power a warp field larger than the ship and generator itself.



Jump to 400 hundred years in the future and humanity has colonized a few other star systems by means of sub-light, generation ships. They then develop a functioning warp bridge, rather than a ship drive, by building massive warp field generators on each end.



The generator stations, basically warp gates for simplicity, generate the necessary energy over several days, and then expend it all in a single day or a few hours (undecided) to power the warp field.



Would massive flywheels be a valid form of energy storage? If not, what other ideas of energy storage might be more reasonable?



I would like to clarify that this is the heaviest handwavium in my entire story. Besides the completion of warp theory, functioning cryogenics, fusion drive technology, and some advances in material science, the story is supposed to be as reasonably realistic as I can get. Real physics. No artificial gravity. Space travel takes days and weeks between planets in-system. The warp gates are posted at the far edge of a solar system, allowing instantaneous travel between systems, but once exiting the gate traveling in-system is much slower again.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Flywheels are in fact used for various applications that need high, short-duration current without affecting the local grid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Test_laboratories So having a large one in your warp station is simple extrapolation.
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago










  • Here's another article detailing the use of Flywheels and Batteries for high impact energy usage. ktoo.org/2017/09/15/… I'm not smart enough to answer whether or not that can be extrapolated.
    – GuidingOlive
    50 mins ago














2












2








2







This is something that was just offhandedly mentioned in a Sci-Fi book I read once and as I am now writing one myself I thought I might use it.



The scenario is that I have a ship approaching a warp gate and am describing the appearance and mechanics of the gate. The idea is that warp drive research on Earth ended in a dead end because we were never able to effectively produce enough energy to power a warp field larger than the ship and generator itself.



Jump to 400 hundred years in the future and humanity has colonized a few other star systems by means of sub-light, generation ships. They then develop a functioning warp bridge, rather than a ship drive, by building massive warp field generators on each end.



The generator stations, basically warp gates for simplicity, generate the necessary energy over several days, and then expend it all in a single day or a few hours (undecided) to power the warp field.



Would massive flywheels be a valid form of energy storage? If not, what other ideas of energy storage might be more reasonable?



I would like to clarify that this is the heaviest handwavium in my entire story. Besides the completion of warp theory, functioning cryogenics, fusion drive technology, and some advances in material science, the story is supposed to be as reasonably realistic as I can get. Real physics. No artificial gravity. Space travel takes days and weeks between planets in-system. The warp gates are posted at the far edge of a solar system, allowing instantaneous travel between systems, but once exiting the gate traveling in-system is much slower again.










share|improve this question













This is something that was just offhandedly mentioned in a Sci-Fi book I read once and as I am now writing one myself I thought I might use it.



The scenario is that I have a ship approaching a warp gate and am describing the appearance and mechanics of the gate. The idea is that warp drive research on Earth ended in a dead end because we were never able to effectively produce enough energy to power a warp field larger than the ship and generator itself.



Jump to 400 hundred years in the future and humanity has colonized a few other star systems by means of sub-light, generation ships. They then develop a functioning warp bridge, rather than a ship drive, by building massive warp field generators on each end.



The generator stations, basically warp gates for simplicity, generate the necessary energy over several days, and then expend it all in a single day or a few hours (undecided) to power the warp field.



Would massive flywheels be a valid form of energy storage? If not, what other ideas of energy storage might be more reasonable?



I would like to clarify that this is the heaviest handwavium in my entire story. Besides the completion of warp theory, functioning cryogenics, fusion drive technology, and some advances in material science, the story is supposed to be as reasonably realistic as I can get. Real physics. No artificial gravity. Space travel takes days and weeks between planets in-system. The warp gates are posted at the far edge of a solar system, allowing instantaneous travel between systems, but once exiting the gate traveling in-system is much slower again.







physics space-travel space-constructs engineering






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









TitaniumTurtle

1,644528




1,644528








  • 1




    Flywheels are in fact used for various applications that need high, short-duration current without affecting the local grid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Test_laboratories So having a large one in your warp station is simple extrapolation.
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago










  • Here's another article detailing the use of Flywheels and Batteries for high impact energy usage. ktoo.org/2017/09/15/… I'm not smart enough to answer whether or not that can be extrapolated.
    – GuidingOlive
    50 mins ago














  • 1




    Flywheels are in fact used for various applications that need high, short-duration current without affecting the local grid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Test_laboratories So having a large one in your warp station is simple extrapolation.
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago










  • Here's another article detailing the use of Flywheels and Batteries for high impact energy usage. ktoo.org/2017/09/15/… I'm not smart enough to answer whether or not that can be extrapolated.
    – GuidingOlive
    50 mins ago








1




1




Flywheels are in fact used for various applications that need high, short-duration current without affecting the local grid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Test_laboratories So having a large one in your warp station is simple extrapolation.
– jamesqf
2 hours ago




Flywheels are in fact used for various applications that need high, short-duration current without affecting the local grid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Test_laboratories So having a large one in your warp station is simple extrapolation.
– jamesqf
2 hours ago












Here's another article detailing the use of Flywheels and Batteries for high impact energy usage. ktoo.org/2017/09/15/… I'm not smart enough to answer whether or not that can be extrapolated.
– GuidingOlive
50 mins ago




Here's another article detailing the use of Flywheels and Batteries for high impact energy usage. ktoo.org/2017/09/15/… I'm not smart enough to answer whether or not that can be extrapolated.
– GuidingOlive
50 mins ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















2














Yes, but...



Flywheels are being used to store energy today, only not in any great amounts, and not as means of transporting energy from one place to another.



enter image description here



That big circle is a flywheel, acting as a sort of energy buffer between the strokes of the single cylinder of the locomotive.



In general, storing energy as momentum is a bad idea. You cannot store a lot of it before the flywheel is spinning so fast it tears itself apart, and unless you solve friction issues, you will quickly lose it as heat.



Also you get another problem: gyroscopic forces. Conservation of moment of inertia means that means you must mount these flywheels on some kind of gimbal, or you will never be able to turn your ship.



Finally, I must point out the inherent danger of having a huge rotating object inside your ship. Unlike chemical or nuclear fuel, you cannot just dump the energy and be rid of it. Also it means that your transport medium is extremely volatile. One thing that goes wrong with this... and you are in for a very bad time.






share|improve this answer





















  • You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
    – Gary Walker
    47 mins ago



















2














It is possible, but maybe not the best idea



Modern flywheels can accumulate a good amount of energy Energy densities, and they are relatively safe (meaning, they won't explosively disintegrate like solid flywheels can do), but they trail other means of energy storage in terms of energy density. Flywheel's specific energy, in MJ/kg, goes to 0.5, which is on par with regular Li-ion batteries, worse than Lithium metal batteries (1.8), and way, way worse than Hydrogen fuel cells (142). Actually, Wiki's figure for hydrogen assumes Earth conditions, where oxygen is plentiful. In spaceships, oxygen storage is also required. This would make the whole system several times less efficient per unit of mass, but still much better than a flywheel.



Flywheels are good when energy comes and goes in mechanical form. If you need the energy in a different form (to power the warp field) there will be extra overhead that would further negate their advantages.



But for creating a "streampunk universe", why not, go with flywheels!






share|improve this answer































    1














    Flywheels are not ideal for your application in the 25th century.



    Due to materials advances, flywheels would have a larger capacity than today, but there are 2 reasonable tech advances that would likely be much nicer.



    Super-capacitors have already been proposed that have energy densities equal to fuel cells. They also have power densities that are orders of magnitudes better. It is hard to predict just how powerful these could become with an additional 400 years of advances.



    Room temperature superconductors may lead to high capacity storage as well.



    Both of these technologies are inherently electrical instead of mechanical, and potentially more usable for directly powering a warp field.



    You specify powering a warp gate for hours or more, these technologies would be suitable for this, or for powering warp gates for minutes or even seconds.



    Flywheels are rarely used as a power source for hours, they are more commonly used as a power source for minutes or seconds until a secondary power source can respond (such as a diesel generator). This is because the storage densities of flywheels is relatively low.



    But spinning metal is very good at averaging power fluctuations. In fact, spinning metal in the generators themselves is a large component in power averaging the current electric grid.



    If you want another solution, consider the possibility of using hafnium, specifically 178m2Hf. You need technical advances to figure out how to release the stored energy when desired, but the storage potential is huge. This adds complication in radio-activity and how to convert the gamma energy-release into something for powering your warp-generators, but this could be woven into an interesting plot-line.






    share|improve this answer































      1














      The answer is almost certainly no, but here's your state of the art:



      Superconducting Flywheel



      This flywheel built around superconducting magnetic bearings is about 2m wide and 4 tons. It holds 100kW-h and can output it at 300kW, which means it can dump all of its energy in somewhere around 20-30 minutes.



      You mentioned that warp drive tech failed to be developed on Earth because they couldn't get the power. Well that means we can draw meaningful comparisons to Earth power plants, like Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station in Japan. That mighty force can generate 8,212,000kW of power. This means you need 27,000 of those superconducting flywheels to match her output.



      One of the major limits to effectiveness of modern flywheels is tensile strength. As you store more power, you put more stress on the material. At some point, the flywheel tears itself apart. (By the way, you want to make sure these flywheels are well insulated from one another... a chain reaction of exploding flywheels is a horrible sight to see. Here's what a small one can do).



      Also consider that we can generate higher power discharges. Power plants are designed for generating continous power. If you just need a discrete shock, you may want to look at the Z-pinch machines like the Z-Machine at Sandia labs



      Z machine



      Besides looking freaking awesome in pictures, the Z-machine is capable of generating pulses as strong as 350 TW (That's 350,000,000,000 kW, if we keep the kW units we used for flywheels), and there are plans on the drawing board for a new device that can hit 1PW (1,000,000,000,000 kW).






      share|improve this answer































        0














        If you need all your energy to be released in one go (is in the case of generator stations) you have significantly fewer options than normal. Any thermal method of energy generation will likely be too hot for most materials and batteries are simply too slow to release your energy. This leaves you with just capacitors, flywheels and maybe handwavium if you've got it. Though in all honesty this explanation requires the bulk your energy to be released very quickly for batteries to be non-competitive.



        (in space) Flywheels are very very cheap. This is because they are incredibly simple. if you find a significantly massive asteroid (of which there will probably be millions in any given solar system) you can simply smelt it into steel (quite cheap given the awsome source of energy that is fusion) and then BAMN flywheel, much more processing would be required for a given energy of capacitor bank.) The flywheel in question would be massive though.



        With good barings your flywheel will basically lose no energy to the outside would



        Lets say you have a 100 MW reactor given a energy density of 32 Watt-hours per kilogram storing energy over a week then that's going to be 500000 tons of steel. That's about 70 effiel towers. This is definitely doable just make sure to have your flywheels by BIG.






        share|improve this answer





















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134515%2fare-fly-wheels-a-valid-means-of-energy-storage-for-powering-a-large-space-statio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Yes, but...



          Flywheels are being used to store energy today, only not in any great amounts, and not as means of transporting energy from one place to another.



          enter image description here



          That big circle is a flywheel, acting as a sort of energy buffer between the strokes of the single cylinder of the locomotive.



          In general, storing energy as momentum is a bad idea. You cannot store a lot of it before the flywheel is spinning so fast it tears itself apart, and unless you solve friction issues, you will quickly lose it as heat.



          Also you get another problem: gyroscopic forces. Conservation of moment of inertia means that means you must mount these flywheels on some kind of gimbal, or you will never be able to turn your ship.



          Finally, I must point out the inherent danger of having a huge rotating object inside your ship. Unlike chemical or nuclear fuel, you cannot just dump the energy and be rid of it. Also it means that your transport medium is extremely volatile. One thing that goes wrong with this... and you are in for a very bad time.






          share|improve this answer





















          • You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
            – Gary Walker
            47 mins ago
















          2














          Yes, but...



          Flywheels are being used to store energy today, only not in any great amounts, and not as means of transporting energy from one place to another.



          enter image description here



          That big circle is a flywheel, acting as a sort of energy buffer between the strokes of the single cylinder of the locomotive.



          In general, storing energy as momentum is a bad idea. You cannot store a lot of it before the flywheel is spinning so fast it tears itself apart, and unless you solve friction issues, you will quickly lose it as heat.



          Also you get another problem: gyroscopic forces. Conservation of moment of inertia means that means you must mount these flywheels on some kind of gimbal, or you will never be able to turn your ship.



          Finally, I must point out the inherent danger of having a huge rotating object inside your ship. Unlike chemical or nuclear fuel, you cannot just dump the energy and be rid of it. Also it means that your transport medium is extremely volatile. One thing that goes wrong with this... and you are in for a very bad time.






          share|improve this answer





















          • You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
            – Gary Walker
            47 mins ago














          2












          2








          2






          Yes, but...



          Flywheels are being used to store energy today, only not in any great amounts, and not as means of transporting energy from one place to another.



          enter image description here



          That big circle is a flywheel, acting as a sort of energy buffer between the strokes of the single cylinder of the locomotive.



          In general, storing energy as momentum is a bad idea. You cannot store a lot of it before the flywheel is spinning so fast it tears itself apart, and unless you solve friction issues, you will quickly lose it as heat.



          Also you get another problem: gyroscopic forces. Conservation of moment of inertia means that means you must mount these flywheels on some kind of gimbal, or you will never be able to turn your ship.



          Finally, I must point out the inherent danger of having a huge rotating object inside your ship. Unlike chemical or nuclear fuel, you cannot just dump the energy and be rid of it. Also it means that your transport medium is extremely volatile. One thing that goes wrong with this... and you are in for a very bad time.






          share|improve this answer












          Yes, but...



          Flywheels are being used to store energy today, only not in any great amounts, and not as means of transporting energy from one place to another.



          enter image description here



          That big circle is a flywheel, acting as a sort of energy buffer between the strokes of the single cylinder of the locomotive.



          In general, storing energy as momentum is a bad idea. You cannot store a lot of it before the flywheel is spinning so fast it tears itself apart, and unless you solve friction issues, you will quickly lose it as heat.



          Also you get another problem: gyroscopic forces. Conservation of moment of inertia means that means you must mount these flywheels on some kind of gimbal, or you will never be able to turn your ship.



          Finally, I must point out the inherent danger of having a huge rotating object inside your ship. Unlike chemical or nuclear fuel, you cannot just dump the energy and be rid of it. Also it means that your transport medium is extremely volatile. One thing that goes wrong with this... and you are in for a very bad time.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          MichaelK

          35.9k689151




          35.9k689151












          • You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
            – Gary Walker
            47 mins ago


















          • You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
            – Gary Walker
            47 mins ago
















          You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
          – Gary Walker
          47 mins ago




          You are right that stored power in flywheels is dangerous, but large amounts stored power is always potentially dangerous if that power can ever be released in an uncontrolled manner.
          – Gary Walker
          47 mins ago











          2














          It is possible, but maybe not the best idea



          Modern flywheels can accumulate a good amount of energy Energy densities, and they are relatively safe (meaning, they won't explosively disintegrate like solid flywheels can do), but they trail other means of energy storage in terms of energy density. Flywheel's specific energy, in MJ/kg, goes to 0.5, which is on par with regular Li-ion batteries, worse than Lithium metal batteries (1.8), and way, way worse than Hydrogen fuel cells (142). Actually, Wiki's figure for hydrogen assumes Earth conditions, where oxygen is plentiful. In spaceships, oxygen storage is also required. This would make the whole system several times less efficient per unit of mass, but still much better than a flywheel.



          Flywheels are good when energy comes and goes in mechanical form. If you need the energy in a different form (to power the warp field) there will be extra overhead that would further negate their advantages.



          But for creating a "streampunk universe", why not, go with flywheels!






          share|improve this answer




























            2














            It is possible, but maybe not the best idea



            Modern flywheels can accumulate a good amount of energy Energy densities, and they are relatively safe (meaning, they won't explosively disintegrate like solid flywheels can do), but they trail other means of energy storage in terms of energy density. Flywheel's specific energy, in MJ/kg, goes to 0.5, which is on par with regular Li-ion batteries, worse than Lithium metal batteries (1.8), and way, way worse than Hydrogen fuel cells (142). Actually, Wiki's figure for hydrogen assumes Earth conditions, where oxygen is plentiful. In spaceships, oxygen storage is also required. This would make the whole system several times less efficient per unit of mass, but still much better than a flywheel.



            Flywheels are good when energy comes and goes in mechanical form. If you need the energy in a different form (to power the warp field) there will be extra overhead that would further negate their advantages.



            But for creating a "streampunk universe", why not, go with flywheels!






            share|improve this answer


























              2












              2








              2






              It is possible, but maybe not the best idea



              Modern flywheels can accumulate a good amount of energy Energy densities, and they are relatively safe (meaning, they won't explosively disintegrate like solid flywheels can do), but they trail other means of energy storage in terms of energy density. Flywheel's specific energy, in MJ/kg, goes to 0.5, which is on par with regular Li-ion batteries, worse than Lithium metal batteries (1.8), and way, way worse than Hydrogen fuel cells (142). Actually, Wiki's figure for hydrogen assumes Earth conditions, where oxygen is plentiful. In spaceships, oxygen storage is also required. This would make the whole system several times less efficient per unit of mass, but still much better than a flywheel.



              Flywheels are good when energy comes and goes in mechanical form. If you need the energy in a different form (to power the warp field) there will be extra overhead that would further negate their advantages.



              But for creating a "streampunk universe", why not, go with flywheels!






              share|improve this answer














              It is possible, but maybe not the best idea



              Modern flywheels can accumulate a good amount of energy Energy densities, and they are relatively safe (meaning, they won't explosively disintegrate like solid flywheels can do), but they trail other means of energy storage in terms of energy density. Flywheel's specific energy, in MJ/kg, goes to 0.5, which is on par with regular Li-ion batteries, worse than Lithium metal batteries (1.8), and way, way worse than Hydrogen fuel cells (142). Actually, Wiki's figure for hydrogen assumes Earth conditions, where oxygen is plentiful. In spaceships, oxygen storage is also required. This would make the whole system several times less efficient per unit of mass, but still much better than a flywheel.



              Flywheels are good when energy comes and goes in mechanical form. If you need the energy in a different form (to power the warp field) there will be extra overhead that would further negate their advantages.



              But for creating a "streampunk universe", why not, go with flywheels!







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 58 mins ago

























              answered 1 hour ago









              Alexander

              18.5k42972




              18.5k42972























                  1














                  Flywheels are not ideal for your application in the 25th century.



                  Due to materials advances, flywheels would have a larger capacity than today, but there are 2 reasonable tech advances that would likely be much nicer.



                  Super-capacitors have already been proposed that have energy densities equal to fuel cells. They also have power densities that are orders of magnitudes better. It is hard to predict just how powerful these could become with an additional 400 years of advances.



                  Room temperature superconductors may lead to high capacity storage as well.



                  Both of these technologies are inherently electrical instead of mechanical, and potentially more usable for directly powering a warp field.



                  You specify powering a warp gate for hours or more, these technologies would be suitable for this, or for powering warp gates for minutes or even seconds.



                  Flywheels are rarely used as a power source for hours, they are more commonly used as a power source for minutes or seconds until a secondary power source can respond (such as a diesel generator). This is because the storage densities of flywheels is relatively low.



                  But spinning metal is very good at averaging power fluctuations. In fact, spinning metal in the generators themselves is a large component in power averaging the current electric grid.



                  If you want another solution, consider the possibility of using hafnium, specifically 178m2Hf. You need technical advances to figure out how to release the stored energy when desired, but the storage potential is huge. This adds complication in radio-activity and how to convert the gamma energy-release into something for powering your warp-generators, but this could be woven into an interesting plot-line.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    1














                    Flywheels are not ideal for your application in the 25th century.



                    Due to materials advances, flywheels would have a larger capacity than today, but there are 2 reasonable tech advances that would likely be much nicer.



                    Super-capacitors have already been proposed that have energy densities equal to fuel cells. They also have power densities that are orders of magnitudes better. It is hard to predict just how powerful these could become with an additional 400 years of advances.



                    Room temperature superconductors may lead to high capacity storage as well.



                    Both of these technologies are inherently electrical instead of mechanical, and potentially more usable for directly powering a warp field.



                    You specify powering a warp gate for hours or more, these technologies would be suitable for this, or for powering warp gates for minutes or even seconds.



                    Flywheels are rarely used as a power source for hours, they are more commonly used as a power source for minutes or seconds until a secondary power source can respond (such as a diesel generator). This is because the storage densities of flywheels is relatively low.



                    But spinning metal is very good at averaging power fluctuations. In fact, spinning metal in the generators themselves is a large component in power averaging the current electric grid.



                    If you want another solution, consider the possibility of using hafnium, specifically 178m2Hf. You need technical advances to figure out how to release the stored energy when desired, but the storage potential is huge. This adds complication in radio-activity and how to convert the gamma energy-release into something for powering your warp-generators, but this could be woven into an interesting plot-line.






                    share|improve this answer


























                      1












                      1








                      1






                      Flywheels are not ideal for your application in the 25th century.



                      Due to materials advances, flywheels would have a larger capacity than today, but there are 2 reasonable tech advances that would likely be much nicer.



                      Super-capacitors have already been proposed that have energy densities equal to fuel cells. They also have power densities that are orders of magnitudes better. It is hard to predict just how powerful these could become with an additional 400 years of advances.



                      Room temperature superconductors may lead to high capacity storage as well.



                      Both of these technologies are inherently electrical instead of mechanical, and potentially more usable for directly powering a warp field.



                      You specify powering a warp gate for hours or more, these technologies would be suitable for this, or for powering warp gates for minutes or even seconds.



                      Flywheels are rarely used as a power source for hours, they are more commonly used as a power source for minutes or seconds until a secondary power source can respond (such as a diesel generator). This is because the storage densities of flywheels is relatively low.



                      But spinning metal is very good at averaging power fluctuations. In fact, spinning metal in the generators themselves is a large component in power averaging the current electric grid.



                      If you want another solution, consider the possibility of using hafnium, specifically 178m2Hf. You need technical advances to figure out how to release the stored energy when desired, but the storage potential is huge. This adds complication in radio-activity and how to convert the gamma energy-release into something for powering your warp-generators, but this could be woven into an interesting plot-line.






                      share|improve this answer














                      Flywheels are not ideal for your application in the 25th century.



                      Due to materials advances, flywheels would have a larger capacity than today, but there are 2 reasonable tech advances that would likely be much nicer.



                      Super-capacitors have already been proposed that have energy densities equal to fuel cells. They also have power densities that are orders of magnitudes better. It is hard to predict just how powerful these could become with an additional 400 years of advances.



                      Room temperature superconductors may lead to high capacity storage as well.



                      Both of these technologies are inherently electrical instead of mechanical, and potentially more usable for directly powering a warp field.



                      You specify powering a warp gate for hours or more, these technologies would be suitable for this, or for powering warp gates for minutes or even seconds.



                      Flywheels are rarely used as a power source for hours, they are more commonly used as a power source for minutes or seconds until a secondary power source can respond (such as a diesel generator). This is because the storage densities of flywheels is relatively low.



                      But spinning metal is very good at averaging power fluctuations. In fact, spinning metal in the generators themselves is a large component in power averaging the current electric grid.



                      If you want another solution, consider the possibility of using hafnium, specifically 178m2Hf. You need technical advances to figure out how to release the stored energy when desired, but the storage potential is huge. This adds complication in radio-activity and how to convert the gamma energy-release into something for powering your warp-generators, but this could be woven into an interesting plot-line.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 39 mins ago

























                      answered 58 mins ago









                      Gary Walker

                      14.7k22754




                      14.7k22754























                          1














                          The answer is almost certainly no, but here's your state of the art:



                          Superconducting Flywheel



                          This flywheel built around superconducting magnetic bearings is about 2m wide and 4 tons. It holds 100kW-h and can output it at 300kW, which means it can dump all of its energy in somewhere around 20-30 minutes.



                          You mentioned that warp drive tech failed to be developed on Earth because they couldn't get the power. Well that means we can draw meaningful comparisons to Earth power plants, like Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station in Japan. That mighty force can generate 8,212,000kW of power. This means you need 27,000 of those superconducting flywheels to match her output.



                          One of the major limits to effectiveness of modern flywheels is tensile strength. As you store more power, you put more stress on the material. At some point, the flywheel tears itself apart. (By the way, you want to make sure these flywheels are well insulated from one another... a chain reaction of exploding flywheels is a horrible sight to see. Here's what a small one can do).



                          Also consider that we can generate higher power discharges. Power plants are designed for generating continous power. If you just need a discrete shock, you may want to look at the Z-pinch machines like the Z-Machine at Sandia labs



                          Z machine



                          Besides looking freaking awesome in pictures, the Z-machine is capable of generating pulses as strong as 350 TW (That's 350,000,000,000 kW, if we keep the kW units we used for flywheels), and there are plans on the drawing board for a new device that can hit 1PW (1,000,000,000,000 kW).






                          share|improve this answer




























                            1














                            The answer is almost certainly no, but here's your state of the art:



                            Superconducting Flywheel



                            This flywheel built around superconducting magnetic bearings is about 2m wide and 4 tons. It holds 100kW-h and can output it at 300kW, which means it can dump all of its energy in somewhere around 20-30 minutes.



                            You mentioned that warp drive tech failed to be developed on Earth because they couldn't get the power. Well that means we can draw meaningful comparisons to Earth power plants, like Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station in Japan. That mighty force can generate 8,212,000kW of power. This means you need 27,000 of those superconducting flywheels to match her output.



                            One of the major limits to effectiveness of modern flywheels is tensile strength. As you store more power, you put more stress on the material. At some point, the flywheel tears itself apart. (By the way, you want to make sure these flywheels are well insulated from one another... a chain reaction of exploding flywheels is a horrible sight to see. Here's what a small one can do).



                            Also consider that we can generate higher power discharges. Power plants are designed for generating continous power. If you just need a discrete shock, you may want to look at the Z-pinch machines like the Z-Machine at Sandia labs



                            Z machine



                            Besides looking freaking awesome in pictures, the Z-machine is capable of generating pulses as strong as 350 TW (That's 350,000,000,000 kW, if we keep the kW units we used for flywheels), and there are plans on the drawing board for a new device that can hit 1PW (1,000,000,000,000 kW).






                            share|improve this answer


























                              1












                              1








                              1






                              The answer is almost certainly no, but here's your state of the art:



                              Superconducting Flywheel



                              This flywheel built around superconducting magnetic bearings is about 2m wide and 4 tons. It holds 100kW-h and can output it at 300kW, which means it can dump all of its energy in somewhere around 20-30 minutes.



                              You mentioned that warp drive tech failed to be developed on Earth because they couldn't get the power. Well that means we can draw meaningful comparisons to Earth power plants, like Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station in Japan. That mighty force can generate 8,212,000kW of power. This means you need 27,000 of those superconducting flywheels to match her output.



                              One of the major limits to effectiveness of modern flywheels is tensile strength. As you store more power, you put more stress on the material. At some point, the flywheel tears itself apart. (By the way, you want to make sure these flywheels are well insulated from one another... a chain reaction of exploding flywheels is a horrible sight to see. Here's what a small one can do).



                              Also consider that we can generate higher power discharges. Power plants are designed for generating continous power. If you just need a discrete shock, you may want to look at the Z-pinch machines like the Z-Machine at Sandia labs



                              Z machine



                              Besides looking freaking awesome in pictures, the Z-machine is capable of generating pulses as strong as 350 TW (That's 350,000,000,000 kW, if we keep the kW units we used for flywheels), and there are plans on the drawing board for a new device that can hit 1PW (1,000,000,000,000 kW).






                              share|improve this answer














                              The answer is almost certainly no, but here's your state of the art:



                              Superconducting Flywheel



                              This flywheel built around superconducting magnetic bearings is about 2m wide and 4 tons. It holds 100kW-h and can output it at 300kW, which means it can dump all of its energy in somewhere around 20-30 minutes.



                              You mentioned that warp drive tech failed to be developed on Earth because they couldn't get the power. Well that means we can draw meaningful comparisons to Earth power plants, like Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station in Japan. That mighty force can generate 8,212,000kW of power. This means you need 27,000 of those superconducting flywheels to match her output.



                              One of the major limits to effectiveness of modern flywheels is tensile strength. As you store more power, you put more stress on the material. At some point, the flywheel tears itself apart. (By the way, you want to make sure these flywheels are well insulated from one another... a chain reaction of exploding flywheels is a horrible sight to see. Here's what a small one can do).



                              Also consider that we can generate higher power discharges. Power plants are designed for generating continous power. If you just need a discrete shock, you may want to look at the Z-pinch machines like the Z-Machine at Sandia labs



                              Z machine



                              Besides looking freaking awesome in pictures, the Z-machine is capable of generating pulses as strong as 350 TW (That's 350,000,000,000 kW, if we keep the kW units we used for flywheels), and there are plans on the drawing board for a new device that can hit 1PW (1,000,000,000,000 kW).







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 4 mins ago

























                              answered 10 mins ago









                              Cort Ammon

                              108k17187382




                              108k17187382























                                  0














                                  If you need all your energy to be released in one go (is in the case of generator stations) you have significantly fewer options than normal. Any thermal method of energy generation will likely be too hot for most materials and batteries are simply too slow to release your energy. This leaves you with just capacitors, flywheels and maybe handwavium if you've got it. Though in all honesty this explanation requires the bulk your energy to be released very quickly for batteries to be non-competitive.



                                  (in space) Flywheels are very very cheap. This is because they are incredibly simple. if you find a significantly massive asteroid (of which there will probably be millions in any given solar system) you can simply smelt it into steel (quite cheap given the awsome source of energy that is fusion) and then BAMN flywheel, much more processing would be required for a given energy of capacitor bank.) The flywheel in question would be massive though.



                                  With good barings your flywheel will basically lose no energy to the outside would



                                  Lets say you have a 100 MW reactor given a energy density of 32 Watt-hours per kilogram storing energy over a week then that's going to be 500000 tons of steel. That's about 70 effiel towers. This is definitely doable just make sure to have your flywheels by BIG.






                                  share|improve this answer


























                                    0














                                    If you need all your energy to be released in one go (is in the case of generator stations) you have significantly fewer options than normal. Any thermal method of energy generation will likely be too hot for most materials and batteries are simply too slow to release your energy. This leaves you with just capacitors, flywheels and maybe handwavium if you've got it. Though in all honesty this explanation requires the bulk your energy to be released very quickly for batteries to be non-competitive.



                                    (in space) Flywheels are very very cheap. This is because they are incredibly simple. if you find a significantly massive asteroid (of which there will probably be millions in any given solar system) you can simply smelt it into steel (quite cheap given the awsome source of energy that is fusion) and then BAMN flywheel, much more processing would be required for a given energy of capacitor bank.) The flywheel in question would be massive though.



                                    With good barings your flywheel will basically lose no energy to the outside would



                                    Lets say you have a 100 MW reactor given a energy density of 32 Watt-hours per kilogram storing energy over a week then that's going to be 500000 tons of steel. That's about 70 effiel towers. This is definitely doable just make sure to have your flywheels by BIG.






                                    share|improve this answer
























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0






                                      If you need all your energy to be released in one go (is in the case of generator stations) you have significantly fewer options than normal. Any thermal method of energy generation will likely be too hot for most materials and batteries are simply too slow to release your energy. This leaves you with just capacitors, flywheels and maybe handwavium if you've got it. Though in all honesty this explanation requires the bulk your energy to be released very quickly for batteries to be non-competitive.



                                      (in space) Flywheels are very very cheap. This is because they are incredibly simple. if you find a significantly massive asteroid (of which there will probably be millions in any given solar system) you can simply smelt it into steel (quite cheap given the awsome source of energy that is fusion) and then BAMN flywheel, much more processing would be required for a given energy of capacitor bank.) The flywheel in question would be massive though.



                                      With good barings your flywheel will basically lose no energy to the outside would



                                      Lets say you have a 100 MW reactor given a energy density of 32 Watt-hours per kilogram storing energy over a week then that's going to be 500000 tons of steel. That's about 70 effiel towers. This is definitely doable just make sure to have your flywheels by BIG.






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      If you need all your energy to be released in one go (is in the case of generator stations) you have significantly fewer options than normal. Any thermal method of energy generation will likely be too hot for most materials and batteries are simply too slow to release your energy. This leaves you with just capacitors, flywheels and maybe handwavium if you've got it. Though in all honesty this explanation requires the bulk your energy to be released very quickly for batteries to be non-competitive.



                                      (in space) Flywheels are very very cheap. This is because they are incredibly simple. if you find a significantly massive asteroid (of which there will probably be millions in any given solar system) you can simply smelt it into steel (quite cheap given the awsome source of energy that is fusion) and then BAMN flywheel, much more processing would be required for a given energy of capacitor bank.) The flywheel in question would be massive though.



                                      With good barings your flywheel will basically lose no energy to the outside would



                                      Lets say you have a 100 MW reactor given a energy density of 32 Watt-hours per kilogram storing energy over a week then that's going to be 500000 tons of steel. That's about 70 effiel towers. This is definitely doable just make sure to have your flywheels by BIG.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 55 mins ago









                                      Ummdustry

                                      3,614721




                                      3,614721






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134515%2fare-fly-wheels-a-valid-means-of-energy-storage-for-powering-a-large-space-statio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                                          How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                                          TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'