If the expansion of the universe were to stop, would galaxies continue moving away from each other at a...











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Consider a simple universe consisting of two very distant galaxies (neglect gravity between them). The relative motion between them is such that, if the universe were not expanding, they would be at rest relative to each other. Due to the expansion of the universe, however, the distance between them keeps increasing, at an accelerated rate, suppose.



My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of (accelerated) motion?



It surely is similar to literal motion in many respects. It can be measured in the same units as literal acceleration. Light reaching each galaxy from the other is suitably red-shifted... Etc.



Yet, it is not like literal motion in other respects. No energy is needed to accelerate either galaxy (I take it that dark energy is postulated only to overcome gravity, not to "cause" the expansion... right?). Relative velocity can (and actually does in some cases) exceed the speed of light, without contradicting SR. No inertial forces are thought to be involved due to their "acceleration" (or are there?). No repulsive force between the galaxies could possibly "cause" this "motion" (at most, a repulsive force would cause the two galaxies to accelerate, in the literal sense). Etc.



So, is it or is it not literally a kind of motion? For example, were the expansion of the universe suddenly to stop, would the two galaxies continue moving away from each other at a constant speed (as they would if it was literally a kind of motion)?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Consider a simple universe consisting of two very distant galaxies (neglect gravity between them). The relative motion between them is such that, if the universe were not expanding, they would be at rest relative to each other. Due to the expansion of the universe, however, the distance between them keeps increasing, at an accelerated rate, suppose.



    My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of (accelerated) motion?



    It surely is similar to literal motion in many respects. It can be measured in the same units as literal acceleration. Light reaching each galaxy from the other is suitably red-shifted... Etc.



    Yet, it is not like literal motion in other respects. No energy is needed to accelerate either galaxy (I take it that dark energy is postulated only to overcome gravity, not to "cause" the expansion... right?). Relative velocity can (and actually does in some cases) exceed the speed of light, without contradicting SR. No inertial forces are thought to be involved due to their "acceleration" (or are there?). No repulsive force between the galaxies could possibly "cause" this "motion" (at most, a repulsive force would cause the two galaxies to accelerate, in the literal sense). Etc.



    So, is it or is it not literally a kind of motion? For example, were the expansion of the universe suddenly to stop, would the two galaxies continue moving away from each other at a constant speed (as they would if it was literally a kind of motion)?










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Consider a simple universe consisting of two very distant galaxies (neglect gravity between them). The relative motion between them is such that, if the universe were not expanding, they would be at rest relative to each other. Due to the expansion of the universe, however, the distance between them keeps increasing, at an accelerated rate, suppose.



      My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of (accelerated) motion?



      It surely is similar to literal motion in many respects. It can be measured in the same units as literal acceleration. Light reaching each galaxy from the other is suitably red-shifted... Etc.



      Yet, it is not like literal motion in other respects. No energy is needed to accelerate either galaxy (I take it that dark energy is postulated only to overcome gravity, not to "cause" the expansion... right?). Relative velocity can (and actually does in some cases) exceed the speed of light, without contradicting SR. No inertial forces are thought to be involved due to their "acceleration" (or are there?). No repulsive force between the galaxies could possibly "cause" this "motion" (at most, a repulsive force would cause the two galaxies to accelerate, in the literal sense). Etc.



      So, is it or is it not literally a kind of motion? For example, were the expansion of the universe suddenly to stop, would the two galaxies continue moving away from each other at a constant speed (as they would if it was literally a kind of motion)?










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Consider a simple universe consisting of two very distant galaxies (neglect gravity between them). The relative motion between them is such that, if the universe were not expanding, they would be at rest relative to each other. Due to the expansion of the universe, however, the distance between them keeps increasing, at an accelerated rate, suppose.



      My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of (accelerated) motion?



      It surely is similar to literal motion in many respects. It can be measured in the same units as literal acceleration. Light reaching each galaxy from the other is suitably red-shifted... Etc.



      Yet, it is not like literal motion in other respects. No energy is needed to accelerate either galaxy (I take it that dark energy is postulated only to overcome gravity, not to "cause" the expansion... right?). Relative velocity can (and actually does in some cases) exceed the speed of light, without contradicting SR. No inertial forces are thought to be involved due to their "acceleration" (or are there?). No repulsive force between the galaxies could possibly "cause" this "motion" (at most, a repulsive force would cause the two galaxies to accelerate, in the literal sense). Etc.



      So, is it or is it not literally a kind of motion? For example, were the expansion of the universe suddenly to stop, would the two galaxies continue moving away from each other at a constant speed (as they would if it was literally a kind of motion)?







      cosmology spacetime space-expansion






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Qmechanic

      99.7k121781119




      99.7k121781119






      New contributor




      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 9 hours ago









      Emiliano Boccardi

      213




      213




      New contributor




      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The universe is expanding overall, and galaxies have relatively small “peculiar velocities” relative to the expanding universe. If you ignore the latter, then if the universe were to stop expanding, the galaxies would stop moving apart.



          So the “motion” of galaxies due to the expanding universe is quite different from ordinary “inertial” motion. There are no non-inertial forces arising from the accelerating expansion of the universe.



          You really should not think of the galaxies as moving at all. (Again, ignoring their “peculiar motion”.) They are sitting still in an expanding universe, while expanding space causes the distance between them and other galaxies to increase.



          Since they are not really moving, this explains why their separation can increase at a rate faster than $c$. There is no speed limit on the expansion of space. There is only a speed limit on how fast objects can move through space.






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            2
            down vote














            My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of
            (accelerated) motion?




            That depends on your definition of various terms like distance, speed and acceleration. Generally the answer is "yes", this is "real" acceleration. And that's because relativity told us not to confuse measurements with something "outside" the universe, whatever you're using to measure that acceleration is part of the universe too.



            But I think you may actually be asking another question, so let me expand a bit...



            What I think you're asking is whether the galaxies are accelerating relative to the universe. That is, if the two galaxies are at rest relative to each other now, and they are not in the future, then is that because the universe itself moved, or the galaxies within it?



            In that case we need some way to measure that original speed. We have such a way. If you consider the Cosmic Background Radiation to be at rest relative to the universe, then you can measure your velocity relative to it. If you did this before and after the galaxies accelerated away from each other, they would both notice no change - so in that respect they didn't accelerate, and it was the universe itself did.



            Whether there's a difference between those two statements really comes down to various definitions. But back to the original question...




            If the expansion of the universe were to stop, would galaxies continue
            moving away from each other at a constant speed?




            Yes, at least in relation to their existing speed relative to the CMB. For the Milky Way that;s, IIRC, about 0.01 c.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
              – Emiliano Boccardi
              8 hours ago












            • Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
              – Maury Markowitz
              8 hours ago










            • So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
              – Maury Markowitz
              8 hours ago










            • I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
              – Emiliano Boccardi
              8 hours ago




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Whether you say that the universe is expanding, or that the galaxies are moving away from each other, is just a matter of what reference frame you choose to use. Both descriptions are equally legitimate.



            If you imagine a rigid grid with uniform spacing in all spacial directions, then it is natural to say that the galaxies are moving. If you imagine a flexible grid with galaxies at fixed coordinate values, then it would be natural to say that the universe is expanding.



            In principle, General Relativity applies to either type of frame. However, it has no clear way of comparing times, speeds, and distances of very distant objects, unless particular reference frames are used. The Friedman equations that describe the expanding universe use a particularly convenient frame with fixed coordinates for the galaxies and a notion of an overall cosmological time, together with a time-varying scale factor for the grid. But that is just a computational convenience, not a conceptual imperative.



            So, your question as written doesn't really make sense. Stopping the expansion would mean stopping the motion. And the question of whether the expansion is accelerating or not makes no difference in this regard.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "151"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442986%2fif-the-expansion-of-the-universe-were-to-stop-would-galaxies-continue-moving-aw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              3
              down vote













              The universe is expanding overall, and galaxies have relatively small “peculiar velocities” relative to the expanding universe. If you ignore the latter, then if the universe were to stop expanding, the galaxies would stop moving apart.



              So the “motion” of galaxies due to the expanding universe is quite different from ordinary “inertial” motion. There are no non-inertial forces arising from the accelerating expansion of the universe.



              You really should not think of the galaxies as moving at all. (Again, ignoring their “peculiar motion”.) They are sitting still in an expanding universe, while expanding space causes the distance between them and other galaxies to increase.



              Since they are not really moving, this explains why their separation can increase at a rate faster than $c$. There is no speed limit on the expansion of space. There is only a speed limit on how fast objects can move through space.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                The universe is expanding overall, and galaxies have relatively small “peculiar velocities” relative to the expanding universe. If you ignore the latter, then if the universe were to stop expanding, the galaxies would stop moving apart.



                So the “motion” of galaxies due to the expanding universe is quite different from ordinary “inertial” motion. There are no non-inertial forces arising from the accelerating expansion of the universe.



                You really should not think of the galaxies as moving at all. (Again, ignoring their “peculiar motion”.) They are sitting still in an expanding universe, while expanding space causes the distance between them and other galaxies to increase.



                Since they are not really moving, this explains why their separation can increase at a rate faster than $c$. There is no speed limit on the expansion of space. There is only a speed limit on how fast objects can move through space.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  The universe is expanding overall, and galaxies have relatively small “peculiar velocities” relative to the expanding universe. If you ignore the latter, then if the universe were to stop expanding, the galaxies would stop moving apart.



                  So the “motion” of galaxies due to the expanding universe is quite different from ordinary “inertial” motion. There are no non-inertial forces arising from the accelerating expansion of the universe.



                  You really should not think of the galaxies as moving at all. (Again, ignoring their “peculiar motion”.) They are sitting still in an expanding universe, while expanding space causes the distance between them and other galaxies to increase.



                  Since they are not really moving, this explains why their separation can increase at a rate faster than $c$. There is no speed limit on the expansion of space. There is only a speed limit on how fast objects can move through space.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  The universe is expanding overall, and galaxies have relatively small “peculiar velocities” relative to the expanding universe. If you ignore the latter, then if the universe were to stop expanding, the galaxies would stop moving apart.



                  So the “motion” of galaxies due to the expanding universe is quite different from ordinary “inertial” motion. There are no non-inertial forces arising from the accelerating expansion of the universe.



                  You really should not think of the galaxies as moving at all. (Again, ignoring their “peculiar motion”.) They are sitting still in an expanding universe, while expanding space causes the distance between them and other galaxies to increase.



                  Since they are not really moving, this explains why their separation can increase at a rate faster than $c$. There is no speed limit on the expansion of space. There is only a speed limit on how fast objects can move through space.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago

























                  answered 7 hours ago









                  G. Smith

                  2,980615




                  2,980615






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote














                      My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of
                      (accelerated) motion?




                      That depends on your definition of various terms like distance, speed and acceleration. Generally the answer is "yes", this is "real" acceleration. And that's because relativity told us not to confuse measurements with something "outside" the universe, whatever you're using to measure that acceleration is part of the universe too.



                      But I think you may actually be asking another question, so let me expand a bit...



                      What I think you're asking is whether the galaxies are accelerating relative to the universe. That is, if the two galaxies are at rest relative to each other now, and they are not in the future, then is that because the universe itself moved, or the galaxies within it?



                      In that case we need some way to measure that original speed. We have such a way. If you consider the Cosmic Background Radiation to be at rest relative to the universe, then you can measure your velocity relative to it. If you did this before and after the galaxies accelerated away from each other, they would both notice no change - so in that respect they didn't accelerate, and it was the universe itself did.



                      Whether there's a difference between those two statements really comes down to various definitions. But back to the original question...




                      If the expansion of the universe were to stop, would galaxies continue
                      moving away from each other at a constant speed?




                      Yes, at least in relation to their existing speed relative to the CMB. For the Milky Way that;s, IIRC, about 0.01 c.






                      share|cite|improve this answer





















                      • Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago












                      • Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago

















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote














                      My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of
                      (accelerated) motion?




                      That depends on your definition of various terms like distance, speed and acceleration. Generally the answer is "yes", this is "real" acceleration. And that's because relativity told us not to confuse measurements with something "outside" the universe, whatever you're using to measure that acceleration is part of the universe too.



                      But I think you may actually be asking another question, so let me expand a bit...



                      What I think you're asking is whether the galaxies are accelerating relative to the universe. That is, if the two galaxies are at rest relative to each other now, and they are not in the future, then is that because the universe itself moved, or the galaxies within it?



                      In that case we need some way to measure that original speed. We have such a way. If you consider the Cosmic Background Radiation to be at rest relative to the universe, then you can measure your velocity relative to it. If you did this before and after the galaxies accelerated away from each other, they would both notice no change - so in that respect they didn't accelerate, and it was the universe itself did.



                      Whether there's a difference between those two statements really comes down to various definitions. But back to the original question...




                      If the expansion of the universe were to stop, would galaxies continue
                      moving away from each other at a constant speed?




                      Yes, at least in relation to their existing speed relative to the CMB. For the Milky Way that;s, IIRC, about 0.01 c.






                      share|cite|improve this answer





















                      • Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago












                      • Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of
                      (accelerated) motion?




                      That depends on your definition of various terms like distance, speed and acceleration. Generally the answer is "yes", this is "real" acceleration. And that's because relativity told us not to confuse measurements with something "outside" the universe, whatever you're using to measure that acceleration is part of the universe too.



                      But I think you may actually be asking another question, so let me expand a bit...



                      What I think you're asking is whether the galaxies are accelerating relative to the universe. That is, if the two galaxies are at rest relative to each other now, and they are not in the future, then is that because the universe itself moved, or the galaxies within it?



                      In that case we need some way to measure that original speed. We have such a way. If you consider the Cosmic Background Radiation to be at rest relative to the universe, then you can measure your velocity relative to it. If you did this before and after the galaxies accelerated away from each other, they would both notice no change - so in that respect they didn't accelerate, and it was the universe itself did.



                      Whether there's a difference between those two statements really comes down to various definitions. But back to the original question...




                      If the expansion of the universe were to stop, would galaxies continue
                      moving away from each other at a constant speed?




                      Yes, at least in relation to their existing speed relative to the CMB. For the Milky Way that;s, IIRC, about 0.01 c.






                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      My general question is: is this "acceleration" literally a kind of
                      (accelerated) motion?




                      That depends on your definition of various terms like distance, speed and acceleration. Generally the answer is "yes", this is "real" acceleration. And that's because relativity told us not to confuse measurements with something "outside" the universe, whatever you're using to measure that acceleration is part of the universe too.



                      But I think you may actually be asking another question, so let me expand a bit...



                      What I think you're asking is whether the galaxies are accelerating relative to the universe. That is, if the two galaxies are at rest relative to each other now, and they are not in the future, then is that because the universe itself moved, or the galaxies within it?



                      In that case we need some way to measure that original speed. We have such a way. If you consider the Cosmic Background Radiation to be at rest relative to the universe, then you can measure your velocity relative to it. If you did this before and after the galaxies accelerated away from each other, they would both notice no change - so in that respect they didn't accelerate, and it was the universe itself did.



                      Whether there's a difference between those two statements really comes down to various definitions. But back to the original question...




                      If the expansion of the universe were to stop, would galaxies continue
                      moving away from each other at a constant speed?




                      Yes, at least in relation to their existing speed relative to the CMB. For the Milky Way that;s, IIRC, about 0.01 c.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 9 hours ago









                      Maury Markowitz

                      3,151523




                      3,151523












                      • Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago












                      • Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago




















                      • Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago












                      • Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
                        – Maury Markowitz
                        8 hours ago










                      • I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
                        – Emiliano Boccardi
                        8 hours ago


















                      Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
                      – Emiliano Boccardi
                      8 hours ago






                      Thanks, Maury. But did the speed of our galaxy relative to CMB increase due to the expansion? I mean, this velocity of the milky way was not acquired due to the expansion of the universe: it is a local happenstance, right? In the simple universe I imagined, before the expansion, the velocity of the two galaxies relative to CMB is 0. Will it continue being 0 if the expansion were to stop (neglect gravity)?
                      – Emiliano Boccardi
                      8 hours ago














                      Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
                      – Maury Markowitz
                      8 hours ago




                      Ahhh sorry, I didn't finish that thought. No, our motion relative to the CBM is simply the random leftover when you add up all the objects that that galaxy captured. Its the same basic reason the solar system's planets all orbit (mostly) in a plane, that's whatever angular momentum you have when you add up the motion of the random ball of gas it came from.
                      – Maury Markowitz
                      8 hours ago












                      So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
                      – Maury Markowitz
                      8 hours ago




                      So in that respect, a galaxy on the far side of the universe that has a huge velocity relative to us might still measure a very low velocity to the CMB. Now whether you say that's because the universe itself is expanding and everyone is still relative to it, or you prefer to say that's real motion relative to "the thing", well that's entirely definitional.
                      – Maury Markowitz
                      8 hours ago












                      I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
                      – Emiliano Boccardi
                      8 hours ago






                      I see what you mean. In the example I have in mind, however, both galaxies are at rest relative to CBM before the expansion. Under these conditions, would they continue moving relative to each other, if the expansion were to stop? Will their velocity relative to CBM continue to be 0 during the expansion? And after the expansion stopped? Sorry for all these questions, and thanks for your time.
                      – Emiliano Boccardi
                      8 hours ago












                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Whether you say that the universe is expanding, or that the galaxies are moving away from each other, is just a matter of what reference frame you choose to use. Both descriptions are equally legitimate.



                      If you imagine a rigid grid with uniform spacing in all spacial directions, then it is natural to say that the galaxies are moving. If you imagine a flexible grid with galaxies at fixed coordinate values, then it would be natural to say that the universe is expanding.



                      In principle, General Relativity applies to either type of frame. However, it has no clear way of comparing times, speeds, and distances of very distant objects, unless particular reference frames are used. The Friedman equations that describe the expanding universe use a particularly convenient frame with fixed coordinates for the galaxies and a notion of an overall cosmological time, together with a time-varying scale factor for the grid. But that is just a computational convenience, not a conceptual imperative.



                      So, your question as written doesn't really make sense. Stopping the expansion would mean stopping the motion. And the question of whether the expansion is accelerating or not makes no difference in this regard.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Whether you say that the universe is expanding, or that the galaxies are moving away from each other, is just a matter of what reference frame you choose to use. Both descriptions are equally legitimate.



                        If you imagine a rigid grid with uniform spacing in all spacial directions, then it is natural to say that the galaxies are moving. If you imagine a flexible grid with galaxies at fixed coordinate values, then it would be natural to say that the universe is expanding.



                        In principle, General Relativity applies to either type of frame. However, it has no clear way of comparing times, speeds, and distances of very distant objects, unless particular reference frames are used. The Friedman equations that describe the expanding universe use a particularly convenient frame with fixed coordinates for the galaxies and a notion of an overall cosmological time, together with a time-varying scale factor for the grid. But that is just a computational convenience, not a conceptual imperative.



                        So, your question as written doesn't really make sense. Stopping the expansion would mean stopping the motion. And the question of whether the expansion is accelerating or not makes no difference in this regard.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          Whether you say that the universe is expanding, or that the galaxies are moving away from each other, is just a matter of what reference frame you choose to use. Both descriptions are equally legitimate.



                          If you imagine a rigid grid with uniform spacing in all spacial directions, then it is natural to say that the galaxies are moving. If you imagine a flexible grid with galaxies at fixed coordinate values, then it would be natural to say that the universe is expanding.



                          In principle, General Relativity applies to either type of frame. However, it has no clear way of comparing times, speeds, and distances of very distant objects, unless particular reference frames are used. The Friedman equations that describe the expanding universe use a particularly convenient frame with fixed coordinates for the galaxies and a notion of an overall cosmological time, together with a time-varying scale factor for the grid. But that is just a computational convenience, not a conceptual imperative.



                          So, your question as written doesn't really make sense. Stopping the expansion would mean stopping the motion. And the question of whether the expansion is accelerating or not makes no difference in this regard.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Whether you say that the universe is expanding, or that the galaxies are moving away from each other, is just a matter of what reference frame you choose to use. Both descriptions are equally legitimate.



                          If you imagine a rigid grid with uniform spacing in all spacial directions, then it is natural to say that the galaxies are moving. If you imagine a flexible grid with galaxies at fixed coordinate values, then it would be natural to say that the universe is expanding.



                          In principle, General Relativity applies to either type of frame. However, it has no clear way of comparing times, speeds, and distances of very distant objects, unless particular reference frames are used. The Friedman equations that describe the expanding universe use a particularly convenient frame with fixed coordinates for the galaxies and a notion of an overall cosmological time, together with a time-varying scale factor for the grid. But that is just a computational convenience, not a conceptual imperative.



                          So, your question as written doesn't really make sense. Stopping the expansion would mean stopping the motion. And the question of whether the expansion is accelerating or not makes no difference in this regard.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 1 hour ago









                          D. Halsey

                          7062413




                          7062413






















                              Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


















                              Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Emiliano Boccardi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442986%2fif-the-expansion-of-the-universe-were-to-stop-would-galaxies-continue-moving-aw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                              How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                              TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'